Digitalni nekrolozi i 'posthumni' identiteti: Fenomen virtuelnog života nakon smrti / Digital Obituaries and 'Posthumous' Identities: The Phenomenon of Virtual Life After Death

Elvira Čekić

doi:10.48052/19865244.2025.3.43

Authors

Elvira Čekić University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Criminalistics, Criminology and Security Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48052/19865244.2025.3.43

Keywords:

digital obituaries, posthumous identities, virtual mourning, digital memorialization, algorithmic memory, ethical dilemmas of digital inheritance

Abstract

The phenomenon of digital obituaries and posthumous identities is increasingly shaping the way contemporary society perceives death, remembrance, and the grieving process. Death no longer signifies the complete end of social presence, as digital profiles of the deceased remain active on social media platforms even after physical death, enabling a continuity of symbolic connection with them. This paper explores the emotional, psychological, social, ethical, and legal dimensions of digital memorialization, focusing on the impact of virtual spaces and algorithmic reminders on the grieving process and emotional resolution. A qualitative approach was employed in analyzing secondary sources, grounded in contemporary theories of identity, grief, and digital legacy. The paradoxes of digital mourning are analyzed, wherein memorial profiles and digital obituaries may offer a sense of presence and support, yet simultaneously prolong emotional attachment and hinder acceptance of loss. The paper also examines how the algorithmic functioning of digital platforms generates memories and reminders without sensitivity to the emotional state of users, potentially burdening the grieving process further. It raises critical ethical and legal questions surrounding the management of digital identities after death, including unclear ownership, control, and rights to content removal. The complexity of survivors’ emotional responses and the growing significance of digital legacy further reinforce the need for clear regulations aligned with the psychological dimensions of grief and ethical principles of dignity. In this context, digital memorialization emerges not only as a form of remembrance, but also as a challenge requiring thoughtful consideration within the frameworks of mental health, social practice, and legal accountability.

References

Acker, A., & Brubaker, J. R. (2014). Death, memorialization, and social media: A platform perspective for personal archives. Archivaria, The Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469/14791

Adams, E.J. (2024). The Usage of Social Media as a Public Sphere in Discussing the Death of Queen Elizabeth II. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 24. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2024-0027

Ateş, G., Hesse, M., & Cuhls, H. (2024). The Usage of Family Audiobooks as a Legacy for Grieving Minor Children: An Exploratory Quantitative Analysis. Research Square.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-024-08945-x

Banta, N.M. (2016). Death and privacy in the digital age. North Carolina Law Review, 94(3), 928-990. https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1454&context=law_fac_pubs

Bassett, D. (2020). All the ghosts in the machine - illusions of immortality in the digital age. Mortality, 26(3), 362–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2020.1825366

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin University Books. https://amstudugm.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/social-construction-of-reality.pdf

Brkić, A. (2024). Caring for Cultural Heritage: An Integrated Approach to Legal and Ethical Initiatives in the United Kingdom: By Charlotte Woodhead, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 367 pp. Routledge. Taylor & Francis.

Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society, 29(3), 152–163. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300

Brubaker, J. R., Morris, M. R., Doyle, D. T., & Fiesler, C. (2024). AI and the Afterlife: Exploring Digital Legacy Through Artificial Intelligence. Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI: 10.1145/3613905.3636321

Clarke, T., Khlif, W., Ingley, C. (2024). Introduction to the Elgar Encyclopedia of Corporate Governance. Elgar Online https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781839107061/intro.xml

Davoudi, N. (2023). An Uncharted Liminality: The Transformative Impact of Social Media On Mourning in the Digital Age. The IJournal: Student Journal of the Faculty of Information 9 (1):14-34. https://theijournal.ca/index.php/ijournal/article/view/42233/32255

Dinneen, J. D., Krtalić, M., Davoudi, N. Hellmich, H., Ochsner, C., & Bressel, P. (2023). Information science and the inevitable: A literature review at the intersection of death and information management. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.24861

Field, N.P, Gao, B., Paderna, L. (2005). Continuing bonds in bereavement: an attachment theory based perspective. Death Stud. 29(4):277-99. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07481180590923689

Giaxoglou, K. (2020). Mobilizing Grief and Remembrance with and for Networked Publics: towards a Typology of Hyper-Mourning. European Journal of Life Writing, IX: 264-284. https://ejlw.eu/article/view/36910/34377

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. p. 17-25. from The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: The Overlook Press, 1959). https://crossculturalleadership.yolasite.com/resources/Goffman%20%281959%29%20Presentation%20of%20Self%20in%20Everyday%20Life.pdf

Ho, M, T., Mantello, P., & Ho, M.T. (2023). An analytical framework for studying attitude towards emotional AI: The three-pronged approach. MethodsX, 10:102149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016123001498

Huet, T. & Zamboni, L. (2024). Modélisation des interactions en Italie du Nord au premier âge du Fer : de la circulation de parures aux réseaux d’influences culturelles. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 121 (2), pp.307-330. ffhal-04663181f https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8f5be382-fd43-48b3-b4c5-41516a14db4e/files/sxs55mf111

Jacobsen, B. N. (2020). You Have a New Memory: Mediated Memories in the Age of Algorithms. Doctoral Thesis, University of York, Department of Sociology. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/28341/1/Jacobsen_109033505_Thesis.pdf

Karjalainen, E. (2022). 150,000 Ways of Saying Goodbye: Constructing the Space of Ritual Mourning in Digitalised Memorial Sites. MA Thesis, Utrecht University, pp.1-67. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12932/42871/Karjalainen_MA%20Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Kübler-Ross, E., & Kessler, D. (2005). On Grief and Grieving: Finding the Meaning of Grief Through the Five Stages of Loss. Scribner. https://grief.com/images/pdf/5%20Stages%20of%20Grief.pdf

Malicki-Sánchez, K., Ford-Morie, J. & Panos, G. (2024). Beyond Life and Death: Exploring Digital Legacy with Spatial Media, Emerging Technologies, and Evolving Ethics, ACM Digital Library,9:1-29. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3664475.3664559

Mallon, S., Towers, L. (2024). Death, Dying and Bereavement: New Sociological Perspectives. London, Routledge.

McAvoy, E. N., & Kidd, J. (2024). Synthetic Heritage: Online platforms, deceptive genealogy and the ethics of algorithmically generated memory. Memory, Mind & Media, 3: e12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2024.10

Meese, J., Nansen, B., Kohn, T., Arnold, M. & Gibbs, M. (2015) Posthumous personhood and the affordances of digital media, Mortality, 20:4, 408-420. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/69288/1/Meese_et_al_Posthumous%20personhood%20and%20the%20affordances%20of%20digital%20media_libre.pdf

Mitchell, L. M., Stephenson, P. H., Cadell, S., & Macdonald, M. E. (2012). Death and grief on-line: Virtual memorialization and changing concepts of childhood death and parental bereavement on the Internet. Health Sociology Review, 21(4), 413–431. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5172/hesr.2012.21.4.413

O'Connor, M. F. (2019). Grief: A Brief History of Research on How Body, Mind, and Brain Respond to Loss. Psychosom Med.81(8):731-738. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000717

Recuber, T. (2023). The Digital Departed: How We Face Death, Commemorate Life, and Chase Virtual Immortality (, NYU Press online edn., accessed 20 mar. 2025. https://academic.oup.com/nyu-press-scholarship-online/book/56731

Reeves, A., Shaghaghi, A., & Krebs, S., Ashenden, D. (2024). Data After Death: Australian User Preferences and Future Solutions to Protect Posthumous User Data. In: Clarke, N., Furnell, S. (eds) Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance. HAISA 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 722. pp. 213-227. Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-72563-0_15 or pp. 2-15. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.01282

Shear, M. K., Simon, N., Wall, M., Zisook, S., Neimeyer, R., Duan, N., & Reynolds, C. et al (2011). Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28(2), 103–117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075805/

Smyth, B.M., Martin, M.A., & Downing, M. (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Human Research Ethics and Integrity in Australia (1st ed.). Routledge.

Stein, A.G., & Johnson, B.N. (2025). The “favorite person” in borderline personality disorder: A content analysis of social media posts. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388825962_The_favorite_person_in_borderline_personality_disorder_A_content_analysis_of_social_media_posts

Stokes, P. (2012). Ghosts in the Machine: Do the Dead Live on in Facebook? Philos.Technol. 25, 363–379. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-011-0050-7

Tei, S., Fujino, J., & Murai, T. (2025). Navigating the self online. Frontiers in Psychology,Sec. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 16. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499039/full

Tiribelli, S., Pansoni, S., Frontoni, & Giovanola, E. B. (2024). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for Cultural Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(3):293-305. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10680564

Tuominen, I. (2025). Indigenous Peoples and Ethical Guidelines: Are Law and Ethics in Conflict in the Age of Digitalisation? In: Linkola-Aikio, IA., Keskitalo, P., Ballardini, R., Sarantou, M. (eds) Digital Indigenous Cultural Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76941-2_8

Ulguim, P. (2018). Digital Remains Made Public: Sharing the Dead Online and Our Future Digital Mortuary Landscape. AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology Special Volume, 3:153-176. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328313533_Digital_Remains_Made_Public_Sharing_the_Dead_Online_and_our_Future_Digital_Mortuary_Landscape

Wagner, A. J. M. (2018). Do Not Click ‘Like’ When Somebody Has Died: The Role of Norms for Mourning Practices in Social Media”. Social Media+Society,4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117744392

Walter, A. (2015). Communication media and the dead: from the Stone Age to Facebook. Mortality, 20(3), 215–232. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4606816/

Wang, M. (2024). Fluid Modernity and Virtual Communities: An Analysis of the Popularity of MBTI on Social Media. Communications in Humanities Research. https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/chr/article/view/15932/pdf

Widmaier, L., & Stylianou-Lambert, T. (2024). Conducting bereavement interviews: Methodological reflections on talking about death, grief, and memory. In: Koch, G., Smith, R.C. (eds) Future memory practices across institutions, communities, and modalities, pp. 99-116. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/94860/9781040150733.pdf